首页> 外文OA文献 >Ethical and policy issues in cluster randomized trials: rationale and design of a mixed methods research study.
【2h】

Ethical and policy issues in cluster randomized trials: rationale and design of a mixed methods research study.

机译:整群随机试验中的伦理和政策问题:混合方法研究的基本原理和设计。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Cluster randomized trials are an increasingly important methodological tool in health research. In cluster randomized trials, intact social units or groups of individuals, such as medical practices, schools, or entire communities--rather than individual themselves--are randomly allocated to intervention or control conditions, while outcomes are then observed on individual cluster members. The substantial methodological differences between cluster randomized trials and conventional randomized trials pose serious challenges to the current conceptual framework for research ethics. The ethical implications of randomizing groups rather than individuals are not addressed in current research ethics guidelines, nor have they even been thoroughly explored. The main objectives of this research are to: (1) identify ethical issues arising in cluster trials and learn how they are currently being addressed; (2) understand how ethics reviews of cluster trials are carried out in different countries (Canada, the USA and the UK); (3) elicit the views and experiences of trial participants and cluster representatives; (4) develop well-grounded guidelines for the ethical conduct and review of cluster trials by conducting an extensive ethical analysis and organizing a consensus process; (5) disseminate the guidelines to researchers, research ethics boards (REBs), journal editors, and research funders. METHODS: We will use a mixed-methods (qualitative and quantitative) approach incorporating both empirical and conceptual work. Empirical work will include a systematic review of a random sample of published trials, a survey and in-depth interviews with trialists, a survey of REBs, and in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with trial participants and gatekeepers. The empirical work will inform the concurrent ethical analysis which will lead to a guidance document laying out principles, policy options, and rationale for proposed guidelines. An Expert Panel of researchers, ethicists, health lawyers, consumer advocates, REB members, and representatives from low-middle income countries will be appointed. A consensus conference will be convened and draft guidelines will be generated by the Panel; an e-consultation phase will then be launched to invite comments from the broader community of researchers, policy-makers, and the public before a final set of guidelines is generated by the Panel and widely disseminated by the research team.
机译:背景:整群随机试验是健康研究中日益重要的方法论工具。在整群随机试验中,将完整的社会单位或个人群体(例如医疗实践,学校或整个社区)(而不是个人本身)随机分配给干预或控制条件,然后观察单个整群成员的结果。整群随机试验与常规随机试验之间在方法上的重大差异给当前的研究伦理概念框架提出了严峻挑战。当前的研究伦理准则中并未讨论将群体而不是个人进行随机化的伦理意义,甚至没有对其进行彻底探讨。这项研究的主要目的是:(1)识别集群试验中出现的伦理问题,并了解目前如何解决这些问题; (2)了解如何在不同国家(加拿大,美国和英国)进行集群试验的伦理审查; (3)征集试验参与者和小组代表的意见和经验; (4)通过进行广泛的伦理分析并组织共识程序,为伦理行为和群集试验的审查制定有充分根据的指南; (5)将指南分发给研究人员,研究道德委员会(REB),期刊编辑和研究资助者。方法:我们将使用混合方法(定性和定量)方法,结合经验和概念工作。实证工作将包括对已发表的试验的随机样本进行系统的审查,对试验员的调查和深入访谈,对可再生能源机构的调查以及与试验参与者和看门人的深入访谈和焦点小组讨论。实证工作将为同时进行的道德分析提供依据,这将导致一份指导文件,其中列出了拟议准则的原则,政策选择和理由。将任命一个由研究人员,伦理学家,健康律师,消费者权益倡导者,REB成员以及来自中低收入国家的代表组成的专家小组。小组将召开共识会议,并制定准则草案;然后,将启动一个电子咨询阶段,以邀请更广泛的研究人员,政策制定者和公众发表意见,然后由专家组制定并由研究团队广泛传播最终指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号